Skip to main content
Open BetaWe’re learning fast - your sessions and feedback directly shape AI CogniFit.

Pillar POV

Evidence B

Caselet · Innovation PM turns shaky AI deck into Δ proof

How a venture PM used Δ + TLX tiles to move an exec board from skepticism to pilot funding in three weeks.

When the COO rejected their AI pilot, the team stopped pitching hypotheticals and started pasting Analyzer tiles into every memo.

Feb 16, 2025Updated Feb 16, 20254 min read

Executive TL;DR

  • PM team moved COO from skepticism to pilot funding in 3 weeks using Δ + TLX tiles
  • Instrumented 24-hour brief: 25 min faster (62→37 min) with Δ +2, TLX down 40% (68→51)
  • Pasting Analyzer tiles into memos beats slide decks; proof stops hypothetical debates

Do this week: Pick one deliverable and run the PM quickstart Wed; paste 4 tiles into exec memo Friday

Week 0 · Hypothesis without proof

The PM team at a global logistics company built a “GenAI exec briefing assistant.” Demos impressed leadership, but the COO asked a simple question: “Show me the over/under compared to manual briefings.” The PMs had anecdotes, screenshots, and a stack of prompts—no shared Δ, no TLX notes, no reviewer minutes.

The PM lead rebooted the effort. Each Thursday she met with one venture PM, one researcher, and one reviewer. They picked a single deliverable—“24-hour expansion brief”—and ran it twice: manual first, AI second. Self-ratings, reviewer scores, and TLX pulses were logged immediately after each run. They also captured reviewer time to flag rework.

Week 1–2 · Instrument the ritual

  • Baselines. Manual runs averaged 62 minutes of IC time and 14 minutes of reviewer edits. Self-ratings hovered around 7/10; reviewer scores averaged 6. Δ = +1. TLX pulses: mental demand 68, frustration 44.
  • AI-assisted runs. With a locked prompt scaffold, the same deliverable took 37 minutes IC time and 11 minutes reviewer edits. Self-ratings jumped to 9, reviewer scores to 7. Δ = +2 (still safe). TLX dropped to 51/33.

Instead of writing a slide deck, the PM pasted four Analyzer tiles directly into the memo: Δ trend, TLX pulses, reviewer minutes, and annotated outputs. She also called out the guardrails: Fair Trial checklist link, prompt version, reviewer name.

Week 3 · Exec readout

The exec readout changed shape:

  1. Slide 1 – Business story: “Expansion briefs now land in under 40 minutes with lower TLX.”
  2. Slide 2 – Analyzer tiles: Δ (manual vs. AI) and reviewer rework side-by-side.
  3. Slide 3 – TLX snapshot + link to /help/interpretation.
  4. Slide 4 – Next run plan: “2 more cohorts, same prompt scaffolds, collect Δ weekly.”

The COO finally had proof: consistent guardrails, honest Δ, fatigue trending down. Funding released.

Make it your own

  • Recreate the ritual with the Innovation PM quickstart. It already includes the Task Frontier + System Shift diagrams the team pasted into their deck.
  • Drop TLX lanes from the quickstart directly into your memo so everyone knows what “52/35” means.
  • Use /help/interpretation as the appendix so execs see how Δ and TLX translate into go/no-go guidance.

When skeptics ask “why trust AI for this ritual,” send them a memo full of tiles—not adjectives.

Share this POV

Paste the highlights into your next exec memo or stand-up. Link back to this pillar so others can follow the full reasoning.

Next Steps

Ready to measure your AI impact? Start with a quick demo to see your Overestimation Δ and cognitive load metrics.

PrivacyEthicsStatusOpen Beta Terms
Share feedback