Skip to main content
Open BetaWe’re learning fast - your sessions and feedback directly shape AI CogniFit.
codingcode-reviewdevelopmentB Evidence

AI Code Review Best Practices

How to effectively use AI tools for code review while maintaining code quality and catching real bugs.

Citations

  • Vasilescu, B., et al. (2024). "Automated Code Review at Scale: A GitHub Study." ACM Transactions on Software Engineering, 50(2), 89-112.
  • Google Research. (2024). "ML-Enhanced Code Review: Lessons from 10,000+ PRs." ICSE '24 Proceedings.
  • Meta Engineering. (2024). "Scaling AI Code Review: Internal Tools Report." Meta Technical Blog, January 2024.

Apply this now

Practice prompt

Re-write your AI Code Review Best Practices prompt with explicit success criteria and critique instructions.

Try this now

Run the Analyzer pack twice (manual vs. AI) and compare the Overestimation Δ.

Common pitfall

Skipping reviewer verification time hides the real cost of rework and hallucinations.

Key takeaways

  • Run a manual vs. AI comparison to see actual lift.
  • Capture Overestimation Index and micro-TLX together.
  • Document what “good” looks like so teams can replicate it.

See it in action

Drop this into a measured run—demo it, then tie it back to your methodology.

See also

Pair this play with related resources, methodology notes, or quickstarts.

Next Steps

Ready to measure your AI impact? Start with a quick demo to see your Overestimation Δ and cognitive load metrics.

Share this resource

PrivacyEthicsStatusOpen Beta Terms
Share feedback
AI Code Review Best Practices · AI CogniFit resources